2. | A much more thorough reconnaissance than that made by
Johnson and Wolfe would be necessary to establish the extra
cost of the Aqaba route and in fact because of the extremely
difficult nature of the terrain, any cost estimate not based
on a a complete substantially final survey would involve a
great deal of guess work. The extra cost of any any line
through Aqaba would, however, be on the general order of
$10,000,000 to $15,000,000 in addition to the increased cost
due to the in creased length, which by the shortest route to
El Arish, is about, 10% by the longest, that to Alexandria,
about 33%.
|
3. | There is no way to keep the Aqaba route out of Trans-
Jordan, except by laying submarine pipe lines across about
tbree miles of water which, according to the available
navigation charts a maximum depth of about 600 ft. Such
submarine pipe lines are certainy possible, but they would
be objectionable from several standpoints and would add
several million dollars to the cost. |
4. | There is apparently, no feasible route out
of Aqaba that would avoid crossing a small portion of Palestine. |
5. | As to the proposed. by-pass lines for the Suez Canal
designated 1, 2, 3 and 4, on Map No. 1, the first three are
entirely feasible, and the first two from Suez to Alexandria
or Port Said have no serious obstacles. The third route from
Aqaba to |
|