[Previous][Contents][Next]


had already been "king" to the natives when he assumed the crown with regard to the Hellenes.9 Earlier the dating was carried on in the name of Alexander the Great's son, Alexander IV, who had been assassinated in 310/9. Cuneiform texts dated to "Seleucus king" begin, so far as published, in 305/4 B.C.10 On the other hand, there are Babylonian tablets of Alexander IV, 10th (308/7) and even 11th year (307/6).11 Thus, Seleucus' Babylonian accession occurred in 307 or 306, while he became Basileus some time later, after the conquest of the "upper" satrapies in the East, in any case after the coronation of Ptolemaeus I in the winter 305-4.12 At this date, in 307 or 306, Seleucus had just finished his struggle with Antigonus for Babylonia.13 He hardly ruled over any other satrapies.14 As Syria and Asia Minor were in the hands of Antigonus, Seleucus' ambition was aimed at the building of an Eastern Empire. But from time immemorial, and according to a still living and influential tradition,15 the domination of Babylon provided with a title to the Empire of the Orient. Accordingly, Seleucus took the name of the "king of Babylon,"16 neglected by his Macedonian predecessors,17 and abandoned by the Achaemenidae since the Babylonian insurrection in 481.18 But Seleucus antedated his accession and equalized his (fictitious) year I with the year 7 of Alexander IV, beginning at Nisanu I (April 3)

9. Plut. Demetr. 18: after Ptolemaeus,
10. The earliest published text is from the 3rd day of the Babylonian year 304/3 (Parker and Dubberstein, p. 18) but Kugler, Von Moses bis Paulus, 1922, 309, mentions texts from the year 305/4.
11. Parker and Dubberstein, p. 35 ; Unger, Babylon, 1931, p. 320. Parker and Dubberstein, p. 3 5 give the equation: "Year I of Alexander II (IV) = year 8 of Philip." Alexander succeeded to Philip Arrhidaeus in the autumn or the winter 317. Cf. Skeat, 2 9 ; Glanville, Catalogue of Demotic Papyri in the British Museum, I, 1939, p. xix. But Antigonus did not recognize the "puppet" king, a prisoner of Cassander, and Babylonian records continued to be dated to Philip still in August 316. Then, when Antigonus. took over Babylon from Seleucus, he introduced the dating in his own name ("Antigonus, general"). When Seleucus returned in 3 12, he brought into Babylonia the dating to Alexander IV. There is a Babylonian record of Simanu of year 6 of Alexander, son of Alexander, that is from 14 June 3 12 B.C. (Strassmaier, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie, 1888, p. 137). Consequently, reckoning backward, year I of Alexander IV (3,7/16) would have corresponded to year 7 of Philip, according to Babylonian calculations. When the author of the Babylonian chronicle concerning the Diadochi (infra n. 13) mistakenly places Philip's year 4 in 321/0 (instead of 320/19) his chronological error comes from the identification between year I of Alexander and year 8 of Philip. Such mistakes may easily occur in date
    lists where only the relative place of an event is of importance. For instance, cuneiform astronomical tables reckon as the 1st year of Philip Arrhidaeus now 323/2 and now 322/ 1 (Ed. Meyer, Forschungen, II, p. 457; Kugler, Sternhunde, II, pp. 364, 385, 414) ; Similarly, the first year of Antigonus is floating in astronomical tables. See now Bengtson, Die Strategie in der hellenistischen Zeit, I, 1937, p. 112. Likewise, some Greek chroniclers assign Alexander's last year (324-3) to Philip Arrhidaeus, or count 324-3 as the first year of Ptolemaios I. Cf. Jacoby, FrGrH. Kommentar, pp. 695, 699.
12. Diod. XX, 53,4. Seleucus became the ruler of the East before 302 (Diod. XX, 106,3). Cf. Newell, EM, p. 79.
13. The cuneiform chronicle apud Sidney Smith, Babylonian Historical Texts, 1924, p. 145 (cf. Furlani, Momigliano, Rivista di Filologia, 1932, p. 462), tells of war events in Babylonia in the 8th and 9th year of Alexander IV (309-8 and 308-7 B.C.).
14. Perhaps Seleucus retained Media. Cf. Diod. XIX, 92,5.
15. Hildegard Levy, JAOS, 1944, p.200.
16. Sarru Babili. See the inscription of Antiochus I apud Weissbach, Die Keilinschriften der Achaemeniden, 1911, p. 132.
17. Alexander the Great and Philip Arrhidaios only used the title of the "king of lands" (Sar Matatu), as the Achaemenidae since 48 1 B.C. See, e.g., the cuneiform text from 23 Nisanu, year 8 of Philip apud Langdon, Revue d'Assyrologie, XII, 1915, p. 86.
18. Cameron, AJSL, 1941, 322.

[Previous][Contents][Next]


Created by the Digital Documentation Center at AUB in collaboration with Al Mashriq of Høgskolen i Østfold, Norway.

990205 PN - Email: hseeden@aub.edu.lb