![]() |
|||
|
|||
arms, a conventional figure. These and other reasons led me to explain
the scene as a sacrifice of a Roman officer to the victorious god of
Palmyra in the presence of Odenath on the occasion of his visit to
Dura, which took place after his great victories over Shapuhr soon
after the capture of Valerian and the invasion of Syria by Shapuhr. My
tentative interpretation of the drawing has been accepted by A.
Alföldi (Berytus, V, p. 77) and used by him for the
reconstruction of events after the battle of Edessa. I must confess
however that my interpretation of the drawing needs one substantial
correction. The drawing cannot be assigned to the time after A.D. 260.
Professor F. E. Brown drew my attention to the obvious fact that the
northern side of the court of the Azzanathkona temple was found so
well preserved with its wealth of papyri, inscriptions, and drawings
because it was buried during the siege of A.D. 256 under the
embankment, of which I spoke above. It remained buried until we
excavated it. There can be no question therefore of assigning the
drawing to the alleged visit of Odenath to Dura, supposed to be
re-occupied by a detachment of the Roman army soon after the battle of
Edessa, a re- occupation which left no traces in Dura and is in itself
improbable. And yet I maintain my interpretation of the drawing as
commemorating a victory of Odenath over the Persians, a victory which
was of great importance to Dura and to its garrison. Such a victory
may have been that of Odenath during his first expedition against the
Persians, which took place in A.D. 253 and which made it possible for
the Roman garrison of which the nucleus was a Palmyrene unit - the
cohors XX Palmyrenorum - to reoccupy Dura after the short
occupation of it by the Persians. It is probable that on his way back
after his expedition down the Euphrates Odenath paid a visit to Dura
and was greeted as saviour and liberator by the Roman garrison which
had just returned to Dura. No wonder that the sacrifice performed at
this occasion was to Jarhibol, the Sol Invictus of Palmyra, and
at the same time the god protector of the XXth Palmyrene
cohort.77
After the re-occupation of Dura by the Roman garrison the city lived for three years longer its normal life and probably resumed its relations with the Sassanian Empire. I have shown it above. Did the Romans anticipate a new attack of Shapuhr on the Euphrates limes? Information on the military life of Dura in A.D. 254-56 is almost completely lacking. We have no means of ascertaining what was the composition of the |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Created by the Digital
Documentation Center at AUB
in collaboration with Al
Mashriq of Høgskolen i
Østfold, Norway. 990203 PN - Email: hseeden@aub.edu.lb |