[Previous][Contents][Next]


century A.D. and to regard it as the production of a resident of Dura. How and when could a citizen of Dura, a Roman fortress, glorify in the Iranian style a Parthian or a Sassanian victory over anybody, much less over Romans? In view of this I ventured to suggest years ago that the battle of the drawing represented the battle of Edessa, and that it was made by a soldier of the Sassanian army when that army occupied the half-ruined Dura for a while, after the battle of Edessa.

Figure I

FIGURE I

This interpretation does not satisfy me any longer. No trace of evidence pointing to such an occupation has ever been found at Dura, and there is no visible reason for supposing that such an occupation ever took place. Dura with its ruined walls, never repaired after A.D. 256, was of no strategical value either for the Romans or for the Persians. Could we not therefore regard the unfinished drawing as a work of a soldier of the detachment of the Sassanian army which occupied Dura for a short time in A.D. 253? Is perhaps the battle represented the battle of Barbalissus? One may object: why was this drawing not destroyed after the retirement of the Persians from Dura? This is not a serious objection. The drawing was made in one of the many private houses of Dura, that is to say in an obscure place and the owner of the house may have cared little to efface the unfinished drawing, of which the meaning may have remained a mystery to him (the explanatory inscriptions of this drawing are written in Pehlevi).75


75. M. Rostovtzeff and A. Little, "La maison des fresques de Doura-Europos," Mém. Ac. Inscr. XLIII,     1932; Dura Rep. IV, pp. 182 ff.; M. Rostovtzeff, "Dura and the Problem of Parthian Art," Yale

[Previous][Contents][Next]


Created by the Digital Documentation Center at AUB in collaboration with Al Mashriq of Høgskolen i Østfold, Norway.

990203 PN - Email: hseeden@aub.edu.lb